FrostyTech.com Mk.II Synthetic Thermal Heatsink Test Results Results based on readings from a 38x38mm copper interface die with 125W heat load on the Mk.II Test Platform. Thermal Test values for each heatsink were calculated by determining the rise over ambient temperature at time of test. Information on Frostytech's test methodology is available here. Socket 939/940/754 compatible CPU heatsinks
manufacturer:	model no.:	*fan speed:	125w thermal test (°c)	noise level (dba)
Gigabyte	G-Power Pro	high	18.6	71.9
Coolermaster	Hyper6	high	20.5	54.7
Thermaltake	Venus 12	high	21.7	68.1
ASUS	Starice	high	22.8	67.4
Coolermaster	Aquagate Mini	high	23.2	59.2
Thermaltake	Polo 735	high	23.4	68.0
Cooljag	SFO-H	high	23.6	60.6
Alpha	PAL-8150		23.7	58.9
Zalman	CNPS9500LED (clip parallel)	high	23.8	50.3
AVC	Z7U3301001 (stock 939)	high	24.6	59.9
Gigabyte	3D Cooler-Ultra	high	24.8	63.0
Scythe	Shogun	high	26.0	45.9
EKL	V8	high	26.3	57.5
Arctic Cooling	Freezer 64 Pro		26.9	50.9
Gigabyte	3D Rocket-Pro	high	26.9	56.7
Gigabyte	3D Cooler-Pro	high	27.0	62.5
Gigabyte	3D-Rocket		28.9	50.7
Vantec	Mach1	high	29.2	56.9
CoolJag	SFO-D(18SC)		29.6	64.0
Zalman	CNPS7000A-Cu	high	30.3	45.2
Dynatron	SK-V24		30.3	56.4
Verax	Quattro 1	high	30.7	55.4
Zalman	CNPS7000-Cu	high	31.0	45.2
Coolermaster	Hyper48		31.7	43.6
Scythe	Kama SCKK1000		31.9	47.5
Scythe	Samurai SCSM1000	high	32.1	51.6
Zalman	CNPS7000B-CU	high	32.3	44.9
Thermaltake	Silentboost K8		32.3	49.7
Jetart	JAX801		33.2	53.5
Dynatron	A22		34.5	44.5
nPowertek	NPH K8-1		34.6	52.2
Ajigo	MF043-044 (stock 754)		35.0	45.4
Arctic Cooling	Silencer 64 Ultra TC		37.5	55.5
Gigabyte	NeonCooler 8-BL		37.7	42.0
Titan	TTC-K8ATB/825/SC		38.7	63.1
Evercool	K802-715		42.1	51.5
Evercool	Magic Cooler		46.6	55.5
			125w thermal test (°c)	noise level (dba)
*heatsinks are ranked according to the 125w thermal test results column (rise over ambient temp.). low temperatures with low noise levels are considered best. for reference heatsinks with variable-speed fans, only the high speed (12v) fan test result is included in the comparison sheet; more detailed results reside in each specific heatsink review.

Since there is no way to manually control the Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC fan speed, we have only one thermal test result to consider. As the thermistor is placed in an ideal location, one which allows the fan to react to the actual temperature of the heatsink instead of ambient air temperatures, the fan can adjust itself accordingly. This is a good design choice in our opinion.

Ultimately though, the synthetic thermal test results yield a rise above ambient temperature result of 37.5°C, that puts the Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC in a thermal region which is considered satisfactory for the socket 754/939/940 AMD Athlon64 processor.

As a thermally controlled heatsink, one can expect noise levels to vary depending on the temperature of the heatsink. Realistically though, the fan will rotate at a higher speed most often, than its ultra-quiet mode. The Arctic Cooling Silencer 64 Ultra TC compares well to the stock AMD Athlon64 reference heatsink by Ajigo, but is unable to best it acoustically and to a lesser extent in terms of temperature.

Related Articles:

For more reviews on the latest heatsinks and cooling solutions, rely on FrostyTech's inventory of 350+ heatsink reviews. Here are a few other articles that you might enjoy as well...

- Zalman CNPS9500 LED Heatsink Review
- Evercool K802-715CA Athlon64 Heatsink Review
- Cooljag SFO-D(18SC) Skived Copper Opteron Heatsink
- Ajigo MF043044 Athlon64 Heatsink
- Gigabyte Neon Cooler 8-BL Athlon64 Heatsink
- Thermaltake Silent Boost K8 Athlon64 Heatsink
- Thermaltake Venus 12 Athlon64 Heatsink
- Alpha Novatech S-PAL8952 Pentium4 Heatsink Review
- Verax P17CuX Ultra Quiet Heatsink Review